Display:


Re: I don't think the public cares (2.00 / 1)

I don't think they are saying no other woman is qualified.

What is being said is that choosing another woman -- as if just choosing any woman would placate Hillary supporters -- is what would make those supporters angry.

So, I think you're reading something into this that isn't there.


by cuppajoe on Tue Jul 22, 2008 at 11:15:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Seems kinda self-centered (none / 0)

I don't think placating Clinton's supporters at this point is on the agenda.  The half of a tenth of a percent of "Clinton supporters" out there who are so myopic to think that the VP choice has anything to do with Clinton being a woman and who will go McCain or stay home if not appeased... them we can afford to lose.


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.
by Dracomicron on Tue Jul 22, 2008 at 12:16:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Choosing a token candidate (none / 0)

would be collosally stupid.

Clark or Sebelius, please!


His head is bowed. He thinks of men and kings. Yea, when the sick world cries, how can he sleep?
by RisingTide on Tue Jul 22, 2008 at 12:45:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I don't think the public cares (none / 0)

I agree. It certainly could and likely would be potrayed as a clumsy attemp to placate Clinton backers. I just don't think Sebelius is ready for prime time yet, her decent track record in Kansas notwithstanding


by Mayor McCheese on Tue Jul 22, 2008 at 12:49:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I don't think the public cares (none / 0)

correct.

besides, 18M voted for HRC, about 7x the amount of people who lives in kansas.


by darwinism on Tue Jul 22, 2008 at 12:59:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]