Hitting Below the Radar

The McCain campaign's strategy with regards to ads appears to be simple: Above all else, try to get advertisements (particularly those that are only aired a few times as paid spots) repeated as many times as possible on the cable networks for free. The Obama campaign takes a decidedly different tack. Here's MSNBC's First Read:

*** Obama's stealth ad campaign: Over the past week, we've gotten our hands on a number of negative TV ads Obama's been running against McCain in key states like Ohio and Michigan. This is in addition to the tough spot, uncovered by Politico, that Obama's airing in Indiana. Clearly, the Obama campaign isn't interested in telling the media about every single McCain attack ad they're running. Perhaps this is because Obama's brand can't afford to be tarnished too much if he's seen as constantly running negative TV ads. So the campaign simply puts them on the air in key markets, doesn't tell the press about them, and layers those ads with positive ones being run nationally during the Olympics. Also, by not releasing to the media, it forces the McCain camp to wait a day or two before they see the ad. McCain's camp is much more comfortable unveiling their negative ads, perhaps because they want the free press that comes with them. But make no mistake, Obama's running plenty of negative TV ads, particularly in the industrial Midwestern states. In fact, one of Obama's biggest candidate strengths -- which doesn't get the attention it deserves -- is that he plays political hardball as well as his opponents; he just sometimes does it under the radar.

Here's an example of another such ad, one running locally in Ohio:

As you can see, Barack Obama is not afraid to hit John McCain where it counts, having his campaign run compelling and emotive ads exposing McCain's weaknesses on key local issues. We've seen it in Indiana, we've seen it in Nevada, we're seeing it in Ohio, and no doubt it's occurring elsewhere. So while it may seem to some that Obama is not running a sufficiently aggressive effort to pin McCain down for his out of touch positions, the fact of the matter is that just because Obama isn't running a Beltway-focused campaign targeted more at the establishment press than actual voters doesn't mean that Obama isn't holding McCain to account -- because in fact Obama is running tough, hard-hitting ads around the country.



Display:


Interesting (2.00 / 2)

Although, I wonder if it is Obama's strategy or the medias strategy to promote Obama. I wonder.


by ann0nymous on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 01:30:42 PM EST

Re: Interesting (2.00 / 3)

Mojo'd for most convoluted effort in recent memory. (Don't strain like that too often or you'll get a hernia or a hemorrhoid.)


"But not me personally were those cheers for"
by QTG on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 01:45:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Interesting (none / 0)

Convoluted, yes. Possessed of logic or sense? Perhaps not...


by ianrsuk on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 02:12:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Strategy... (2.00 / 1)

It's narrative weaving.

Right now, whatever other effects the McCain ad strategy wants to see, it's undeniable that McCain is getting painted as the 'negative campaigner'.  The polls bear this out.

This is a good narrative for OBama... it lets him continue to run as the agent of change, the enemy of business as usual.

Meanwhile, he can localize the heavy hitting ads where they make the most sense.  The GOP has been doing this for ages -- they narrowly focus their negative attacks on local teevee, cable, and radio where they WORK, but essentially, keep them out of the national narrative.

It also allows 'testing' of ad effectiveness.  

There are ads you want to "use" as ads, and ads you want to be media conversation pieces... and sometimes, you want to see which ads make sense as media conversation pieces.


by zonk on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 01:47:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Seriously (none / 0)

QTG is spot on. Most people would quail at having to make such a leap of logic, you took it on like a true hero. An appropriate attitude for Olympic Week. Mojo!


by Neef on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 02:50:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Interesting (none / 0)

Stealth mojo here.  That was really quite impressive - a high degree of difficulty, yet no signs of straining.

Never let 'em see you sweat.   Kudos to you, sir.


I'm voting for Saxby Chambliss!
by Jess81 on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 03:57:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Interesting strategy (none / 0)

Who knows, maybe it'll work. With the national media protecting McCain, it's probably impossible for Obama to land a knockout punch, but a thousand paper cuts might work just as well.


by Angry White Democrat on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 01:45:42 PM EST

Re: Hitting Below the Radar (2.00 / 3)

Another contrast is the content of the ads; McCain's are little more than frontal character assaults, whereas Obama is actually talking about issues that resonate in the particular area where the ad is being run.  Given the justifiable anxiety that folks have about the economy, I think Obama's focus is a smart move.  To paraphrase John Weaver, this isn't 1988 and the election isn't going to be won or lost based upon flag pins.  


by HSTruman on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 01:47:25 PM EST

Re: Hitting Below the Radar (none / 0)

I was wondering about this. Are the Obama ads particularly 'negative'? In the sense that they attack McCain on policy or votes, then I suppose so, but doesn't (or shouldn't) 'negative' connote something personal or plain untrue?

Haven't watched McCain ads, since as am UK-er I don't feel obliged to assault my stomach so.


by ianrsuk on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 02:19:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hitting Below the Radar (none / 0)

and the election isn't going to be won or lost based upon flag pins.  

True, it'll be won or lost on gas prices. McCain's winning that fight -- that's singularly why the election isn't a blowout right now.


by blueflorida on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 03:02:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hitting Below the Radar (none / 0)

Disagree whole heartedly. Will be won on organization (+Obama),the economy,Mespotamia,oil prices, and the future of the country (All McSame -). Wishful thinking will just get you disappointed when it's all said and done.


onlinesavant
by onlinesavant on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 03:50:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hitting Below the Radar (none / 0)

Take a look at the polling. #1 issue = Economy = Gas Prices. McCain & the RNC managed to con their way into a thin but still surprising lead on that subject. Team Obama needs to step it up.

Sure, organization helps but it won't trump message deficiency.

If 'Mespotamia' was going to be decisive, Obama's vacation would last another week.

If by 'future of the country' you mean the 18-29 vote, I'll grant you that.


by blueflorida on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 04:08:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hitting Below the Radar (none / 0)

Gas prices are part of the economy. You're ignoring the millions of people who are now upside down in their mortgages or lost their home entirely, hundreds of thousands who have losts their jobs, millions who are in debt, and so on. That's why Obama's ads are so effective.
Gas prices have been dropping lately and not because we've suddenly found new sources of oil.
"Who are you for? That is the wrong question. It should be who is for you?" HRC
by skohayes on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 04:21:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hitting Below the Radar (none / 0)

I'm just making the point that gas prices consistently poll the highest of all the different issues that could be gathered under the "economy" heading. Certainly, Team Obama deserves points for speaking to the economy more generally (beyond paying tactical dividends, it's the honest thing to do), and they've clearly been addressing the housing crisis much better than the opposition. I still think gas prices (despite recent declines) are likely to be the main economic battleground going into November, and McCain and his "Drill, Drill, Drill"-ers have the tactical (not moral) highground right now.


by blueflorida on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 04:51:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hitting Below the Radar (2.00 / 2)

These adds are effective because they address issues to which a listener can relate. Kinda like the old adage, "All politics is local."

And there's an added benefit, "Below the Radar." The listener subliminally gets the message: Barack is talking to me. He's taking the time and effort to understand my problems.

In some sense that's how Bill Clinton operated (I feel your pain). Establishing personal connections in a mass way (I know that sounds like an oxymoron) is gotta be a very effective campaign tool.


by Bob Miller on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 05:01:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hitting Below the Radar (none / 0)

Agreed.  I think state/area specific ads probably "pop" a lot more than a generic piece that folks can just tune out.  


by HSTruman on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 05:05:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hitting Below the Radar (none / 0)

People don't pay attention to the lightweigt stuff coming out of the Obama camp. Sorry but they just don't.
  You want to know what people pay attention to? Did you see the Daily Show on August 14th ?  If not ,then check out what Rice has to say in this clip

http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index. jhtml?videoId=179234&title=russo-geo rgian-conflict

Amazing.  Meaning the statements made by Rice,McCain et al.  Astonishing.

"In the 21st Century, countries don't just invade other countries"  How do they say something like that with a straight face and not realize the inherent absurdity of it?  The answer is that they know that if they say it with a straight face, most or many will not get the irony and just go with the illusion and the bravado intended.

It's all pretty remarkable but THAT  is what people pay attention too.


by Lodgemannered on Sat Aug 16, 2008 at 02:36:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hitting Below the Radar (none / 0)

I'm heartened to hear this!  They're clever...very clever.

I feel that we should think of this campaign as a very long game of chess.  It is not always obvious, to untrained eyes like ours, what the heck is actually going on, during the middle of the match.


by snark adam excuse on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 01:51:31 PM EST

Re: Hitting Below the Radar (none / 0)

I'm heartened to hear this!  They're clever...very clever.

I feel that we should think of this campaign as a very long game of chess.  It is not always obvious, to untrained eyes like ours, what the heck is actually going on, during the middle of the match.

My friend you give the American people far too much credit.  


by Lodgemannered on Sat Aug 16, 2008 at 02:38:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hitting Below the Radar (none / 0)

This is running in Michigan

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid= 6297861901565404343&ei=8sKlSNjoBoP04 ALXlZkj&q=michigan+obama+ad&vt=l f


Jesus Christ was a community organizer and Pontius Pilate was a governor.
by GRO on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 01:57:45 PM EST

It's damn clever (2.00 / 3)

because it essentially bypasses the MSM's take, and hits the local viewer directly. McCain is leveraging the media, Obama seems to be actually avoiding it.

It also presents a multi-front war to McCain. Obama can push back on one ad campaign, with one theme. McCain doesn't even know where or how he's getting hit.

I'm not saying it will beat McCain's message advantage, but it's a better strat than I would have come up with.


by Neef on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 02:13:17 PM EST

McCain is running the Clinton campaign (none / 0)

Clinton always beat Obama on media spin and it seems that McCain is the same. They both focused on inane things that interest the media pundits but didn't make their cases directly to the American people. By the time Clinton changed her strategy it was too late. McCain will lose, too, because Team Obama stays focused and knows the way to win is on the ground.


by Lolis on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 02:29:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

McCain is hitting a lot harder (none / 0)

than Clinton ever did, AND a lot nastier. HRCs stuff "kind of, sort of" stuck, McCain's jabs are doing damage (imo).

I think we Dems typically underestimate the GOP slime machine, we don't expect our fellows to be swayed by it. Unfortunately, our fellows often are, and I'm glad Obama is taking the situation seriously.


by Neef on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 02:39:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

isn't it odd (none / 0)

that these ads are posted on the official youtube channel but the media claims to have "discovered" them.  


New Jersey politics and news
by John DE on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 02:43:22 PM EST

Re: isn't it odd (none / 0)

Kind of pathetic, actually.

Everybody here has known about these ads the minute they've been rolled out.

We've posted on them, commented on them...

But, for some reason, the Corporate Media is just discovering them.

Morons.


by Bush Bites on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 04:11:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

It's called a torpedo (none / 0)

McCain was in the Navy, so he should know to look out for them.


by RandyMI on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 02:53:25 PM EST

Re: Hitting Below the Radar (none / 0)


First Read:

In fact, one of Obama's biggest candidate strengths -- which doesn't get the attention it deserves -- is that he plays political hardball as well as his opponents; he just sometimes does it under the radar.

No way! You don't say? Could Bill Clinton be right after all? Let's take a look -- from January '08:


But you know, the idea that one of these campaigns is positive and the other is negative when I know the reverse is true and I have seen it and I have been blistered by it for months, is a little tough to take. Just because of the sanitizing coverage that's in the media, doesn't mean the facts aren't out there.


by blueflorida on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 03:00:34 PM EST

Re: Hitting Below the Radar (none / 0)

So what are you saying P.U.M.A troll? The Clinton campaign wasn't nasty? Show me where Obama himself made any subversively or overtly nasty remark or used some nasty tactic against Clinton. Name one.On the other hand, we can catalog the nasty tactics of the Clinton's against Obama Clinton lost. McCain will lose. Obama will win. get over it.


onlinesavant
by onlinesavant on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 03:57:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hitting Below the Radar (none / 0)

So what are you saying P.U.M.A troll?

Yawn...


McCain will lose. Obama will win.

Looks like we agree about one thing.


by blueflorida on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 04:02:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

This is interesting. (none / 0)

They're playing small ball.

Scratching out singles in doubles on a state-by-state basis and letting McCain swing for the fences nationally.

I would guess this is playing out in the ground games of both sides too.

It's reminding me of the primaries, actually.


by Bush Bites on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 04:08:33 PM EST

anyone notice (none / 0)

from the MSNBC ad on the side of this site the story from Newsweek?
http://www.klay1180.com/advertising.htm
Washington Woman

Progressive Blue

by kevin22262 on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 04:17:08 PM EST

Re: Hitting Below the Radar (none / 0)


Definitely all Hope and Change, this campaign.
by killjoy on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 04:24:21 PM EST

Re: Hitting Below the Radar (none / 0)

Its an effective strategy. Its like a double take. He's all out positive to the greater public but he's also taking jabs at McCain whilst no one is looking.

its a winning strategy.


by alyssa chaos on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 04:33:54 PM EST

Re: Hitting Below the Radar (none / 0)

Was surprised to hear a part-negative/part-positive Obama radio spot in Eau Claire, WI, today.  One that, to the best of my knowledge, was not announced in any way.  Pretty much confirms that strategy in the First Read article.


by alphaaqua on Fri Aug 15, 2008 at 05:15:29 PM EST

Re: Hitting Below the Radar (none / 0)

In fact, one of Obama's biggest candidate strengths -- which doesn't get the attention it deserves -- is that he plays political hardball as well as his opponents; he just sometimes does it under the radar.

I see.So Obabama IS in fact hitting back,but it's just under the radar and not getting too much notice? Right!! Well  I certainly feel a whole lot  feel better now knowing how hard he's hitting McSame back,but that nobody is really seeing that or taking much notice. Good way to win the White House........or maybe not.
 Here are some who aren't too worried about flying under the radar and I bet loads of psycho's .....uhh.. ummm I mean regular folks... will  sit up and take notice.I saw this on a report  yesterday morning.
 According to that report,  
there are nearly 100,000 webpages currently up propagating this notion.

The Omen come to life....

http://www.barackobamaantichrist.blogspo t.com/

Obama and his people might just want to start throwing some punches that actually land. Just a crazy thought I know ..but ..hey.. it's only the Presidency  and the prospect of  another 4 years of a Republican President ,thats at stake. No biggie ...right?!!


by Lodgemannered on Sat Aug 16, 2008 at 01:54:39 AM EST

Re: Hitting Below the Radar (none / 0)

Many of us live in Blue States where no ads are running.  We conclude that Barack is lying down and and not fighting back.  It is good to see that is not true.


by Bob H on Sat Aug 16, 2008 at 06:53:19 AM EST

In the Philadelphia market, (none / 0)

Obama is running a new negative ad. It has a clip of McCain at a Republican debate in January, saying the economy is generally good and unemployment is low. It's followed by snippets from people in Indiana and Ohio talking about how hard things are, including an Iraqi War veteran saying he's been looking for a job for 6 months.

Conversely, McCain is running a positive ad - clips of him stumping with a voice over about how he stood up to big tobacco, that he'll reform Wall Street and stand up to the oil companies. Similar to another ad he ran here in May-June, if you didn't know McCain was a Republican you'd think the ad came from a Democrat.


by Makarov on Sat Aug 16, 2008 at 02:15:04 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.